Back to Top

 Skip navigation

Condition Accounts

Condition

Overall, 51% of monitored river water bodies achieved Good or High ecological status, with 49% assigned Moderate, Poor or Bad ecological status (2016-2021)

CSO statistical release, , 11am
A CSO Frontier Series Output

This publication is categorised as a CSO Frontier Series Output. Particular care must be taken when interpreting the statistics in this release as it may use new methods which are under development and/or data sources which may be incomplete, for example new administrative data sources. 

Condition accounts

This publication presents initial ecosystem condition accounts for Ireland's rivers and lakes based on the ecological status reported by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Condition accounts record the condition of ecosystems in terms of selected characteristics at specific points in time. Over time, these accounts can be used to examine changes in condition, and provide information on the health and function of ecosystems and their capacity to provide ecosystem services. See Background Notes for more information on the WFD, and Information Note on Ecosystem Accounting for more information on condition accounts.

For WFD reporting, Ireland's rivers have been divided into 3,192 discrete sections of river called river water bodies, of which a subset are monitored for ecological status. To compile this preliminary set of condition accounts, only river and lake water bodies monitored in both the first (2010-2015) and second (2016-2021) cycles of the River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) were included. Of the 2,334 river water bodies monitored in both cycles, almost 57% (1,326) were in Good or High ecological status in the 2010-2015 period, compared with 52% (1,213) in the 2016-2021 period, representing a decrease of around 9%. In the 2010-2015 period, around 60% (34,726 km) of the total length of monitored river water bodies achieved Good or High ecological status, compared with 55% (31,683 km) in the 2016-2021 period, a decrease of 9%. 

A small increase in the number of lake water bodies achieving Good or High ecological status was recorded between the time periods, with 46% (103) of the monitored lake water bodies achieving Good or High status in the 2010-2015 period, compared with 48% (107 water bodies) in the 2016-2021 period. This small increase in the number of lake water bodies (around 4%) results in a relatively large increase in area, going from 43% in 2010-2015 to almost 62% in 2016-2021, an increase of around 43% (Table 2.1).

By relating each variable to a reference level, the ecosystem condition variables can be used to calculate ecosystem condition indicator values (see Background Notes for details). In this case, decreases in the number and length of river water bodies reaching Good or High ecological status are reflected in changes in indicator values, with a decrease from 0.57 to 0.52 for number and a decrease from 0.60 to 0.55 for length. Similarly, the increases in number and area of lake water bodies achieving Good or High ecological status can be seen by looking at the indicator values, with an increase from 0.46 to 0.48 for number of water bodies, and an increase from 0.43 to 0.62 for area of lake water bodies (Table 2.1).

Table 2.1 Ecosystem condition accounts for rivers and lakes 2010-20211, 2
 Variable values Reference level values Indicator3 values (rescaled)  
 Opening value (2010-2015)Closing value (2016-2021) Upper level (all reaching Good or High ecological status)Lower level (none reaching Good or High ecological status) Opening value (2010-2015)Closing value (2016-2021)Change in indicator Change in indicator (%)
Monitored river water bodies with High or Good ecological status           
number1,3261,213 2,3340 0.570.52-0.05 -8.5
length (km)34,72631,683 57,7020 0.600.55-0.05 -8.8
% of total river water bodies56.852.0 1000 0.570.52-0.05 -8.5
% of total length60.254.9 1000 0.600.55-0.05 -8.8
           
Monitored lake water bodies with High or Good ecological status          
number103107 2220 0.460.480.02 3.9
area (hectares)41,72559,588 96,2980 0.430.620.19 42.8
% of total lake water bodies46.448.2 1000 0.460.480.02 3.9
% of total area43.361.9 1000 0.430.620.19 42.8
1 Accounts are for those river and lake water bodies monitored in both the first (2010-2015) and second (2016-2021) cycles of the River Basin Management Plans
2 Figures presented in this table are rounded. Percentages and indicator values are calculated using unrounded figures
3 Indicator = (V-VL)/(VH-VL), where V = variable, VH is the high condition score, and VL is the low condition score

When comparing the two assessment periods, the ecological status of 1,396 river water bodies remained unchanged. The ecological status of 407 water bodies improved, including 196 river water bodies that moved from the Moderate, Poor or Bad category to the Good or High category. A decline in ecological status was reported for 531 river water bodies, including 309 water bodies that moved from the Good or High category to the Moderate, Poor or Bad category (Figure 2.1, Table 2.2).

For lake water bodies, 143 remained unchanged, while the ecological status of 46 increased, including 19 that moved from Moderate, Poor or Bad to the Good or High category. Decreases in ecological status were seen in 33 lake water bodies, including 15 that moved from the Good or High category to the Moderate, Poor or Bad category (Figure 2.2, Table 2.2).

X-axis labelGood or HighModerate, Poor or Bad
Status decreased within category102120
Status increased within category89122
Status increased to change category1960
Status decreased to change category0309
No change in status826570
X-axis labelGood or HighModerate, Poor or Bad
Status decreased within category108
Status increased within category324
Status increased to change category190
Status decreased to change category015
No change in status7568
Table 2.2 Changes1 in ecological status of river and lake water bodies between 2010-2015 and 2016-2021 assessment periods
Ecological status category in 2016-2021 Change from 2010-2015River water bodiesLake water bodies
Good or High  Status decreased within category10210
  Status increased within category893
  Status increased from Moderate, Poor or Bad19619
  No change in status82675
     
Moderate, Poor or Bad  Status decreased within category1208
 Status increased within category12224
 Status decreased from Good or High30915
  No change in status57068
     
Total  2,334222
1 Changes reported are for those river and lake water bodies monitored in both the first (2010-2015) and second (2016-2021) cycles of the River Basin Management Plans

Ecological status

Rivers

The total number of river water bodies monitored by the EPA has been increasing since monitoring for the WFD commenced, from 2,161 in the 2007-2009 period to 2,398 in the 2016-2021 period. The percentage of monitored river water bodies reaching Good or High status was highest in the 2010-2012 period at 60% (1,369 water bodies), and there has been a decrease in every monitoring period since then, with around 51% (1,234 water bodies) in Good or High status in 2016-2021. The number of monitored river water bodies in Bad ecological status has decreased from 19 in the 2007-2009 period to 5 in the 2016-2021 period (Figure 2.3, Table 2.3).

X-axis labelHighGoodModeratePoorBad
2007-200928797354933319
2010-2012324104556033811
2010-201524510855974126
2013-201819610516564439
2016-202123210027164435
Table 2.3 Ecological status of monitored river water bodies (2007-2021)
 Assessment period
Status2007-20092010-20122010-20152013-20182016-2021
High287324245196232
Good9731,0451,0851,0511,002
Moderate549560597656716
Poor333338412443443
Bad1911695
Total2,1612,2782,3452,3552,398

The spatial distribution and ecological status of river water bodies for the 2016-2021 assessment period is shown in Map 2.1. 

 Map 2.1 River water bodies by ecological status

 

 

The counties with the lowest percentage of monitored river water bodies in Good or High ecological status in the 2016-2021 period were Louth (20%), Dublin (21%), and Kildare (21%). Cork (73%), Leitrim (72%), and Wicklow (71%) were the counties with the highest percentage of river water bodies in Good or High ecological status (Figure 2.4, Table 2.4).

X-axis labelHighGoodModeratePoorBad
Cork521316090
Donegal206662460
Mayo369044110
Tipperary15474400
Galway177437290
Kerry227734131
Clare34927261
Wicklow14592352
Wexford44131120
Meath12229320
Limerick23424190
Offaly32333170
Sligo163019100
Laois43818150
Cavan53515200
Roscommon22624220
Monaghan41517280
Kilkenny32326101
Waterford112114100
Leitrim6331410
Kildare11020210
Westmeath01617170
Carlow2152130
Dublin2510160
Longford110950
Louth051460
Table 2.4 Ecological status of monitored river water bodies by county (2016-2021)
CountyHighGoodModeratePoorBad Good or High Good or High (%)
Carlow2152130 17 41.5
Cavan53515200 40 53.3
Clare34927261 52 49.1
Cork521316090 183 72.6
Donegal206662460 86 44.3
Dublin2510160 7 21.2
Galway177437290 91 58
Kerry227734131 99 67.3
Kildare11020210 11 21.2
Kilkenny32326101 26 41.3
Laois43818150 42 56
Leitrim6331410 39 72.2
Limerick23424190 36 45.6
Longford110950 11 44
Louth051460 5 20
Mayo369044110 126 69.6
Meath12229320 23 27.4
Monaghan41517280 19 29.7
Offaly32333170 26 34.2
Roscommon22624220 28 37.8
Sligo163019100 46 61.3
Tipperary15474400 55 32.5
Waterford112114100 32 57.1
Westmeath01617170 16 32
Wexford44131120 45 51.1
Wicklow14592352 73 70.9
Total2321,0027164435 1,234  

Lakes

The total number of lake water bodies monitored by the EPA has increased from 220 in the 2007-2009 period to 224 in the 2016-2021 period. The percentage of monitored lake water bodies reaching Good or High status was highest in the 2013-2018 period at 50% (113 water bodies), with the lowest percentage of 44% reported in the 2010-2012 period. Around 48% (107 water bodies) were in Good or High status in the 2016-2021 period. The number of monitored lake water bodies in Bad ecological status peaked at 19 in the 2010-2012 and 2010-2015 assessment periods, and decreased to 8 waterbodies in the 2016-2021 period (Figure 2.5, Table 2.5).

X-axis labelHighGoodModeratePoorBad
2007-20092482782214
2010-20122277733219
2010-20152578752819
2013-20181796722811
2016-2021179081288
Table 2.5 Ecological status of monitored lake water bodies (2007-2021)
 Assessment period
Status2007-20092010-20122010-20152013-20182016-2021
High2422251717
Good8277789690
Moderate7873757281
Poor2232282828
Bad141919118
Total220223225224224

The spatial distribution and ecological status of lake water bodies for the 2016-2021 assessment period is shown in Map 2.2.

Map 2.2 Lake water bodies by ecological status