Back to Top

 Skip navigation

Social Inclusion

€891.70
Weekly household disposable income in 2016

The SILC (Survey on Income and Living Conditions) household survey is the official source of data on household and individual income and also provides a number of key national poverty indicators, such as the ‘at risk of poverty’ rate, the consistent poverty rate and rates of enforced deprivation.

Table 8.1 Average weekly household and individual disposable income, 2006-2016
Statistic20062007200820092010201120122013201420152016
Household disposable income836.44919.66939.89880.78826.96801.43803.51820.77835.92868.01891.70
Equivalised disposable income per individual 406.84452.47467.24447.03424.26410.88413.52421.53429.21446.55457.11
Source: CSO

Interactive table: StatBank link

€457.11
Weekly equivalised disposable income per individual
Open in Excel:
21.0%
The percentage of people considered to be experiencing ‘enforced deprivation’

The percentage of people considered to be experiencing ‘enforced deprivation’, is defined as not being able to afford two or more basics, such as going without heating in the past year, or being unable to afford items such as two pairs of strong shoes, a warm waterproof coat or a meal with meat, chicken fish every second day. 

50.7%
Deprivation rate for those at risk of poverty
8.2 Poverty and deprivation rates, 2006-2016

Consistent povery rateDeprivation rateDeprivation rate for those at risk of povertyAt risk of poverty rate
20066.61438.617
20075.111.831.116.5
20084.213.729.114.4
20095.517.138.814.1
20106.322.642.914.7
20116.924.543.216
20128.526.948.917.3
20139.130.555.116.5
20148.82951.217.2
20158.725.551.516.9
20168.32150.716.5
16.5%
The ‘at risk of poverty’ rate, is the share of persons whose income was less than 60% of the national median income
8.3%
The ‘consistent poverty rate’ includes those persons who are defined as being both at risk of poverty and who are also experiencing enforced deprivation
Open in Excel:

Most common types of deprivation experienced at an overall level were:

21.1%
Unable to replace worn-out furniture
15.5%
Unable to afford a morning/afternoon/evening out in the last fortnight
13.9%
Unable to have family/friends for a drink/meal once a month
X-axis labelQuintile 5Quintile 4Quintile 3Quintile 2 Quintile 1
201638.8222.8317.2112.818.33
201539.0322.9917.0912.668.22
201439.9522.8816.7612.637.78
20134022.8316.712.537.93
201239.6422.9916.9512.77.72
201139.1422.9217.0612.888
201039.8822.3216.8912.688.23
200937.9622.8517.3213.078.8
200839.1522.5816.9612.678.64
200739.7922.8916.7312.338.26
200640.5422.3216.6312.38.21

Figure 8.2 displays the proportion of total income received by each quintile (or 20% of the population).

The share of total income received in 2016 by the 20% of the population with the lowest income (bottom quintile) was 8.3%. By comparison, the total income received by the 20% of population with the highest income (top quintile) in 2016 was 38.8%, a multiple of 4.7. In other words, the bottom quintile have to work for 4.7 years to generate the same income that the top quintile receive in one year.

Go to next chapter >>> Household Budget

Why you can Trust the CSO

Learn about our data and confidentiality safeguards, and the steps we take to produce statistics that can be trusted by all.