Committee members:
Invited presenters:
Agenda
Introduction/Welcome
The first meeting of the CSO Social Statistics Ethics Committee was opened by the Chairperson, Gerry O’Hanlon who welcomed the group. The Chair stated that the initial objective of the group is to assess the proposed Sexual Violence Survey (SVS) pilot from an ethical perspective.
CSO Introduction
Keith McSweeney made a presentation to the group on the ethos and background of the Central Statistics Office, outlining the core values of Independence, Objectivity and Confidentiality that lie at the centre of all CSO work.
Ethical touchpoints
Professor Hannah McGee was welcomed to the session. She was the Principal Investigator of the 2002 Sexual Abuse and Violence in Ireland (SAVI) Report. Prof. McGee began by sharing an overview of the SAVI methodology. She outlined five broad areas for identifying issues that she considered relevant when looking at the pilot SVS methodology:
SVS Introduction
Helen McGrath presented an introduction to the Sexual Violence Survey (SVS) to the group.
It outlined the background to the survey, the development stages for the survey and the modules within the questionnaire. The mode of the pilot survey was discussed in detail due to the changes in household interviewing in the office due to COVID-19. Experience from the use of different modes in the European Gender Based Survey was shared. The presentation summarised the critical importance of a pilot test for a web-based mode.
Ethics and SVS
Helen McGrath made a presentation to the group on “Ethics and the SVS” which outlined the areas in the methodology which reflected ethical best practise. The presentation looked at the issue from a principle’s perspective and also on a comparative basis. The principles used were drawn from the World Health Organisation’s publication on data collection on domestic violence which outlined 8 principles. questionnaire development, methods to address potential respondent distress and staff well-being were detailed.
Terms of Reference
The draft terms of reference for the group was discussed. It was clarified that the group is an advisory group making recommendations to the Director General who will ultimately decide on the final methodology. In light of this, it was suggested that the group change the name to reflect the advisory nature of the committee. The suggestion was CSO Social Statistics Ethics Advisory Group.
Next steps
Minutes of this meeting will be drafted. The next meeting was suggested for the end of January where the CSO will submit in advance a document addressing the points raised in this meeting.
AOB
There were no issues raised under this point
Actions arising from this meeting: